Cybercrime Legislation, Ramification of legislation science homework help

Cybercrime Legislation

A gap exists between current trends
in cybercrime and the government’s response via legislation and regulations. In
the face of jurisdictional issues, constitutional issues, and a complex maze of
federal and local statutes, it is difficult to identify a cohesive and
efficient legal response to the ever evolving nature of computer related
crimes. Rapidly advancing technology and its use in criminal behavior makes it
difficult for legislation to keep pace in efforts to prevent and address
cybercrime. There is a pressing need to implement strategies to better prepare
for emerging trends in crime and to coordinate with a variety of business,
social, and educational institutions; all levels of government; and other
nations around the world.

For this Discussion, consider the
ramifications of legislation being unable to keep pace with emerging uses of
technology for criminal behavior.

Post by Day 4 a description of two possible
ramifications of legislation being unable to keep pace with emerging uses of
technology for criminal behavior. Then provide possible ways to address each
ramification. Finally, explain any impacts on society of legislation being
unable to keep pace with emerging uses of technology for criminal behavior.

One and a half page with at least two references….

It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the
assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT
presenting an explanation from the readings for this class

To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for
this assignments 1) look at the page limits 2) review and follow APA rules
3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and
4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.

Readings

• Course Text: Taylor,
  R. W., Fritsch, E. J., & Liederbach, J. (2015). Digital crime and
  digital terrorism. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Chapter 10,
  “Digital Laws and Legislation” (review)
• Article: Carucci, D.,
  Overhuls, D., & Soares, N. (2011). Computer crimes. American
  Criminal Law Review, 48(2), 375–419.
  Article: Coakley, M. (2009). Privacy protection, safety and
  security: A state law enforcement perspective. The Computer &
  Internet Lawyer, 26(4), 1–11.
  Article: Kahn, S. (2010). “Apps.Gov”: Assessing privacy
  in the cloud computing era. North Carolina Journal of Law &
  Technology Online Edition, 11, 259–289. Retrieved from http://ncjolt.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/V11_On_Khan.pdf
• Article: Lorentz, D.
  (2011). The effectiveness of litigation under the CAN-SPAM Act. The
  Review of Litigation, 30(3), 559–605.
  Article: Rees, A. (2006). Cybercrime laws of the United States.
  Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, U.S. Department of
  Justice. Retrieved from http://www.oas.org/juridico/spanish/us_cyb_laws.pdf
• Article: Shekhter, S.
  (2011). Every step you take, they’ll be watching you: The legal and
  practical implications of lifetime GPS monitoring of sex offenders. Hastings
  Constitutional Law Quarterly, 38(4), 1085–1111.
• Article: Stansky, L.
  (2009). Internet law and cybercrime: The future is here. Student
  Lawyer, 37(6), 8–10.