Evaluation Strategies
Hire our professional essay experts at Gradehunters.net who are available online 24/7 for an essay paper written to a high standard at an affordable cost.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Exploring
Evaluation Strategies
Program evaluation is a methodological area that is closely
related to, but distinguishable from, more traditional social science research
and utilizes many of the same methodologies as traditional research. As it
often takes place in a political and organizational context, it requires group
skills, management ability, political dexterity, sensitivity to multiple
stakeholders, and other skills not always needed in social science research.
Researchers may approach program evaluation from two different perspectives:
formative and summative. Formative evaluation is the process of judging an
ongoing, changing process or product for diagnosis, revision, description,
information, or comparison. The essence of formative evaluation is to improve
programs, understand their strengths in order to amplify them, or isolate and
address weaknesses. Summative evaluation, on the other hand, assesses outcomes
or effectiveness of programs that have already been (and may continue to be)
implemented. Summative evaluation is sometimes a final-end judgment serving
purposes of persuasion, verification, prediction, or validity. Its aim is to
identify patterns of performance, judging these against general criteria such
as effectiveness, value, or impact. Summative evaluation is commonly conducted
after completion of the activity for the benefit of an external audience.
Within the broad categories of formative and summative evaluation, there are
many different evaluation strategies that you could use to evaluate a program
or policy. Among those covered in your book are improvement-oriented
evaluations, needs assessments, and cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness
evaluations, just to name a few. Each has different strengths and weaknesses
and is more or less appropriate for specific research studies.
For this Discussion, consider which evaluation strategies might be relevant to your
area of professional interest and what factors are most important when choosing
an evaluation strategy. Then consider research scenarios for which formative
evaluation would be appropriate and ones for which summative evaluation would
be appropriate.
With these thoughts in mind:
Three evaluation strategies
that might be relevant to your area of professional interest. Describe a study idea within
your area of interest for which formative evaluation would be appropriate and
explain why. Then describe a study idea within your area of interest for which
summative evaluation would be appropriate and explain why. Finally, explain the factors that you think are most important to
consider when choosing an evaluation strategy.
One and a half page with at least two reference….
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the
assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT
presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this
class
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for
this assignments 1) look at the page limits 2) review and follow APA rules
3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and
4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.

Everyone needs a little help with academic work from time to time. Hire the best essay writing professionals working for us today!
Get a 15% discount for your first order
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper