This short paper assignment requires that you locate an individual not  associated with this course to interview. The interview will take  approximately 10–15 minutes to complete. The interview wi

Hire our professional essay experts at Gradehunters.net who are available online 24/7 for an essay paper written to a high standard at an affordable cost.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

This short paper assignment requires that you locate an individual not  associated with this course to interview. The interview will take  approximately 10–15 minutes to complete. The interview will be most  effective in person, but if this is not possible the interview can take  place over the phone, through email, or through any other appropriate  means of technology. During the interview, you will present the  interviewee with the Heinz dilemma, made famous by Kohlberg, and after a  review of the dilemma, you will ask follow-up questions. You will  review your interviewee’s responses and select which stage of moral  development is indicated by the each of the responses. You will reflect  on if you believe this is an accurate assessment of the individual’s  level of moral development. Utilizing criticisms of Kohlberg’s model and  this experience, you will construct a position on the utility of  Kohlberg’s model for assessing moral development. Consider if Kohlberg’s  theory accounts for atypical moral development (i.e., criminal behavior  or aggressive actions).

For additional details, please refer to the Module Eight Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric document.

This short paper assignment requires that you locate an individual not  associated with this course to interview. The interview will take  approximately 10–15 minutes to complete. The interview wi
PSY 632 Module Eight Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric (Moral Development and Dilemma) This short paper assignment require s that you locate an individual not associated with this course to interview. The interview will take approximately 10 –15 minutes to complete. The interview will be most effective in person, but if this is not possible the interview can take place over the phone, thro ugh email, or through any other appropriate means of technology. Please keep any information regarding the interviewee confidential. If you have not done so already, have your interviewee complete a consent form and submit this to your instructor in this module. During the interview, you will pres ent the interviewee with the Heinz dilemma , made famous by Kohlberg : Heinz Dilemma: In E urope, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one dr ug that doctors tho ught might save her. It was a form of radi um that a druggist in the same town had recentl y discovered. The dr ug w as expensive to make, b ut the dr uggist was charging $2 ,000, or 10 times the cost of the dr ug, for a small (possibl y lifesaving) dose. Heinz, the sick woman’s h usband, borrowed all the mone y he co uld, abo ut $2 ,000, or half of what he needed. He told the druggist how his wife was d oing and asked the druggist to sell the dr ug at a lower price or to let him pa y later. The dr uggist replied, “No, I discovered the dr ug, and I’m going to make mone y from it.” Heinz then became desperate and broke into the store to steal the dr ug for his wife. Sho uld Heinz have done that? After reviewing the dilemma with your interviewee, a sk the follow -up questions listed below . Be sure to keep accurate notes of your subject’s response s, as this will help you to complete your paper . 1. Should Heinz steal the drug? Why or why not? 2. If Heinz does no t love his wife, should he steal the drug for her? Why or why not? 3. Suppose the person dying is not his wife but a stranger. Should Heinz steal the drug for a stranger? Why or why not? 4. Why s hould people do everything they can to save another’s life? 5. It is against the law for Heinz to steal? Does that make it morally wrong? Why or why not? 6. Why should people generally do everything they can to avoid breaking the law? How does this relate to H einz’s case? In this short paper, be sure to address the following critical elements:  State of Moral Development : Review your interviewee’s responses and select which stage of moral development is indicated by each response . Did the answers supplied clearly meet the criteria for one stage? If more than one stage might be indicated, which stage is best represented by the collective information provided across all answers?  Reflection : Reflect on if you believe this is an accurate assessment of the individual’s level of moral development. Are the stages of Kohlberg’s m odel comprehensive enough to identify your interviewee? Did your presence influence the interviewee’s answers? What use might a developmental psychologist or a mental health professiona l have for this information? Could this be utilized for assessing specific personality or characterological issues in development?  Position : Utilizing criticisms of Kohlberg’s model and this experience, construct a positio n on the utility of Kohlberg’s m odel for assessing moral development. Consider if Kohlberg’s theory accounts for atypical moral development (i.e. , criminal behavior or aggressive actions). Does Kohlberg’s theory accurately allow the assessment of a person? Might the actions or decisions i n the response to the Heinz or other dilemm as be situationally dependent? Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a two – to three -page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, one -inch margins, and at least thre e sources cited in APA format. Crit ical Elements Exemplary ( 10 0%) Proficient ( 90 %) Needs Improvement ( 70 %) Not Evident (0%) Value Sta ge of Moral Development Meets “Proficient” criteria and the identified sta ge of moral development is substantiated with specific and relevant details Accurately selects a sta ge of moral development that is indicated by the interviewee’s responses Selects a sta ge of moral development that is indicated by the interviewee’s responses, but the selection is inaccurate Does not select a sta ge of moral develo pment that is indicated by the interviewee’s responses 20 Reflection Meets “Proficient” criteria and reflection includes specific and relevan t details supported by research Reflects on the accuracy of the assessment of the i nterviewee’s level of moral development using specific details Reflects on the accuracy of the assessment of the interviewee’s level of moral development but lacks specific details Does not reflect on the accuracy of the assessment of the interviewee’s level of moral development 35 Position Meets “Proficient” criteria and the position is substantiated with specific and relevant details that utilize criticisms of Kohlberg’s model Constructs a positio n on the utility of Kohlberg’s m odel for assessing moral development using specific details Constructs a positio n on the utility of Kohlberg’s m odel for assessing moral development but lacks specific details Does not construct a positio n on the utility of Kohlberg’s model for assessing moral development 35 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a profe ssional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or o rganization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Earned Total 100%

Writerbay.net

Everyone needs a little help with academic work from time to time. Hire the best essay writing professionals working for us today!

Get a 15% discount for your first order


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper